On Wednesday 07 Sep 2005 00:44, ken barber wrote:
> oh, there is one more thing. there are quite a few
> academic types here that are pretty much censored by
> the establishment when they present an opposing view.
> that always couses flags in my mind. if you got an
> opposing view that you consider foolish, you let itgo
> public and let the public draw the opinion that it is
> foolish, but, if you censor it, then it is obviously
> going to make us ostriches wonder just why you are
> afraid of the opposing view.
>

Hi Ken,

Sorry Ken, I don't undestand this.

I thought "academic types" published "results" in academic journals, the
public (who would probably here of it through the general media, rather than
the original report) may well think it foolish. It would no matter a jot to
the author, his concern is that his peers accept his results and hopefully
reproduce them.

Cheers

Deri