Sender: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 13 Feb 2007 15:19:39 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
<01d601c74fa4$e5a4eb90$01fea8c0@KristinaLaptop> |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Kristina K. Carlton wrote:
> So are Bernstein's books worth reading? If you had to recommend one of the
> two, would you get the Diabetes Solution or the Diabetes Diet? Also, the
> Diabetes Solution has a 1997, 2003, and 2007 edition. Is it worth it to get
> the revised editions?
>
I've only read the Diabetes Solution, 2003 edition. A lot of it deals
with type 1 diabetes, but there's a good amount of type 2 info in there
as well, and a lot of general information about glucose metabolism
issues. I don't consider myself diabetic, and my doctor doesn't either,
but at 53 I'm at an age when a lot of people begin to slide in that
direction. I think a paleo diet can arrest that slide, but in terms of
overall health and cardiovascular risk in particular, I think it makes
sense to want to not only arrest the slide but reverse. See
http://www.news-medical.net/?id=13130 for example. That's why I'm not
satisfied with FBG at or near 100, even though that's "normal" for my
age. Bernstein, as I mentioned before, is very unforgiving in his
guidelines, and doesn't take the "good enough" stance toward Bg levels.
I don't know what the 2007 edition might have that's new, but I'd be
interested to find out.
Todd Moody
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|