Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - PALEOFOOD Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
PALEOFOOD Home PALEOFOOD Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Apple Message framework v553)
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed
Date:
Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:00:15 +0900
Reply-To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: The Paleo Diet by Loren Cordain
From:
Thomas Bridgeland <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (43 lines)
On Friday, June 10, 2005, at 11:23  AM, Robert Jones wrote:

> Can anyone explain why organ meats are good for us, but fatty muscle 
> meats
> and eggs are bad for us? They seem to have pretty similar percentages 
> of
> saturated, monounsaturated, and polyunsaturated fats. Both have 
> saturated
> fats that are mostly 16:0 and 18:0. Pork brain has DPA and DHA, but 
> beef
> brain doesn’t; and they both have five time the cholesterol of eggs.
>
> Thanks for any insights into this issue,
> Robert

Hi Robert, welcome. You have hit some of the points of argument pretty 
clearly. Cordain has one opinion, but there are others. I eat organ 
meats and muscle meats and eggs. Brains are hard to find here, and I 
have to admit being squeamish about them anyway! There is little or no 
evidence that eggs or cholesterol in the diet are bad for you.

Cholesterol at high blood levels does increase risk to the heart, but 
it also has many benefits to the body as well. It is a bit of a trade 
off as to whether you prefer to die from a heart attack, stroke, or 
cancer. I have been reading the scientific literature on this topic for 
several  years and can't find any study that shows that high 
cholesterol results in earlier death, unless your cholesterol is very 
very high, in the 300 range and above. Even then, many people who go 
with the paleo diet, or even Atkins, report lowering their cholesterol. 
Some do raise it, though. I am one. My cholesterol rose from 180 to 270 
on the Atkins diet, then has fallen back to 230 since I cut out most 
milk products. At 230, there is no scientific basis to worry about 
heart disease over lower levels.

My person view is that a variety of animal products is good. Eat some 
of all of it, and don't worry about your cholesterol level unless it 
goes through the roof. I also use blood thinners such as tea and grape 
juice, and donate blood twice a year, to limit iron buildup. Everyone 
on this list has his own idiosyncratic ideas about the diet. Do what 
seems best for your own health, from your personal observation and 
study. Cordain and the others can play dueling experts, I take from 
them what seems logical and is validated by my own experience.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV