Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 23 Oct 2004 23:59:16 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Richard,
Acssb would be interesting to experiment with on the amateur bands. I think
it hasn't caught on do to the fact that digital communications techniques
such as apco25 and such are the next communications frontier.
Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2004 5:54 AM
Subject: Re: 220 MHz use and modes used and possible encryption?
> Message-Id:
<20041024035433.XWAR22847.imf23aec.mail.bellsouth.net@[68.212.106.57]>
>
> Dave wrote:
> >From what I understand about the 220/222MHZ band, it is divided
> >into 5KHZ channels. The mode that is used for voice communications
> >is acsb (amplitude commanded single sideband). Acsb is a standard
> >ssb signal that is compressed. There is also a pilot tone inserted
> >3.1khz out from the ssb signal. This enables the receiver to
> >frequency lock to the transmitted signal. When a signal is
> >received the signal is expanded and demodulated like an ssb signal
> >with the pilot notched out. When I lived in north Jersey in the
> >1990s there was a large acssb trunked system in the new York metro
> >area.
> Yep, amplitude companded sideband. IIRC there's a couple questions
> about it in the extra question pool.
> I'm surprised it hasn't caught on more than it has, the advantages of
> sideband without the tuning problems for the average JOe radio user
> who uses commercial type systems.
>
> 73 de nf5b
>
>
>
> Richard Webb
>
> Electric Spider Productions
> almost 50% of those at ground zero on 9/11/01 still have
> longterm health problems. Almost half of those have no health insurance.
>
>
|
|
|