Sender: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 30 May 2005 16:57:42 -0700 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
In-Reply-To: |
<000c01c5632f$2ccaad20$6400a8c0@delllaptop> |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Fri, 27 May 2005 21:44:30 -0500, "Kristina K. Carlton"
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>
>>
>
>>I was wondering how many people on this list follow a completely raw >paleo
>diet?
>
>
>
>>While there is certainly value in many raw foods, I would say that in the
>>modern world, it is not beneficial to eat an exclusively "raw food diet",
>>meaning that "raw" is the principle being followed.
>
>
>
>>There are many details to the reasons, and if you have a lot of spare time,
>>you can read some of the voluminous documentation and discussion at:
>
>
>
>>http://www.beyondveg.com
>
>
>
>>Ken
>
>
>
>Sorry, I should have clarified. I have no intentions of becoming a
>vegetarian, I meant raw including meat/fish/poultry, etc
The web site covers that in detail.
--
Cheers,
Ken
|
|
|