Steve,

Thanks for all the clarification.  I've heard people talking about the g radio but when I did a google search I couldn't find the actual specs on the radio.
Sounds like it may not really be what I'm looking for as I do have the 2010.

I'll have to play more with the synchronous detection on the 2010.  We just moved out of the SF bay area and into the boondocs, so I'm getting
reintroduced to selective fading on the am band again.  <smile>

Thanks for reminding me of the synchronous feature.

Don W6SMB

On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 18:18:09 -0400, Steve Dresser wrote:

Don,

The FM section of the 2010 is pretty mediocre, so I'd have to say that the
Super Radio is much better on that part of the band.  Regarding AM, the
2010 isn't outstanding for sensitivity, but it's probably more selective in
the narrow position.  In the wide position, it probably has a better high
end response than the GE.  The other great plus for the 2010 is the
synchronous detection, which eliminates distortion caused by selective
fading.  In addition, the synchronous detection lets you select the upper
or lower sideband, which can be a big help- if you've got adjacent channel
interference.  Of course, the 2010 also covers the shortwave spectrum, and
has upper and lower sideband, which is irrelevant for the Super Radio.

Steve

On Monday 9/27/2004 16:16 Don Bishop wrote:

 >Maybe this is like comparing apples and oranges, but curious as to how it
 >compares to the Sony icf 2010.