first i apologise for replying twice. what i said in
the first one can only do so much and i'll try to do
that. but, let me refer back to last night. i can not
have enought windows opened to handle situations like
last night. i was replying to a series of post. i
replied to one by deri, then one by kendall, then one
from kat and another by bobby. then when i got thrugh
those i'd have their reply to my replies. mix in the
ocasional from mag and trish. i am not able to see in
the future to reply to emails unopened anmd replys not
yet sent.
i will do as much as i can though.
--- - Joy - <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hi Ken,
>
> I don't mean to be rude, but could I ask you to
> combine some of your =
> posts, instead of responding to each individually?
> I've got ten emails =
> from you in three hours today(three within a minute
> of each other and =
> three more within three minutes of each other), and
> there were a lot =
> more following this pattern last night.  As much as
> I love hearing what =
> you have to say, it's a bit much.  Thanks!
>
> ~Joy~
>




_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Express yourself with Y! Messenger! Free. Download now.
http://messenger.yahoo.com