BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Kenneth Lee <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 09:28:03 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (40 lines)
Sorry if this was already answered... Yes, a full wave loop (in feet) is
1005/freq.  The quad loop is two dipoles stacked on top of each other.
Follow the link below for more information.

http://www.antennex.com/preview/Jan501/quad1.htm

73, Ken -N5SWR


-----Original Message-----
From: Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Walt Sebastian
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 6:34 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: memory of a formula


Hi Guys,
It was Howard that mentioned the full size loop.  Is the formula for a loop
1005 divided by frequency? Now the formula for a half wave dipole is 4 68
divided by frequency.  My next question is why is the loop more than twice
as long as the dipole? Seems like a full size antenna should only be twice
as long.  I am not an engineer though.  73

Walt
WA4QXT
New London CT
[log in to unmask]

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.737 / Virus Database: 491 - Release Date: 8/11/2004


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.737 / Virus Database: 491 - Release Date: 8/11/2004

ATOM RSS1 RSS2