Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | St. John's University Cerebral Palsy List |
Date: | Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:45:08 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
okay i will add another piece of wood to this fire.
i think that the war on drugs is used by our
governments as an excuse to step on constitutional
rights more than anything else.
--- Kendall David Corbett <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I, for one, wouldn't mind seeing some lawyers go out
> of business. If drug abuse were treated as a
> medical/psychological/social problem, the number of
> treatment providers would likely increase.
>
> If the courts weren't so clogged with drug related
> cases, it wouldn't take nearly as long for murder
> cases and the like to come to trial (except for
> continuances and delay tactics - see my first
> comment). And what percentage of property crimes
> are caused by drug deals, and how many violent
> crimes are caused by drug deals gone bad? You're
> probably right that police chiefs and state bureau's
> of criminal investgation wouldn't like to see their
> drug interdiction funds cut, but does any state or
> local level agency like to see it's Federal funding
> cut? I't's probably going to happen to a lot of
> programs in the next two years, with Medicaid being
> at the top of the list.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [log in to unmask]
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Wed 1/5/2005 10:06 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: drugs was "if you're against the iraqi
> war..."
>
>
>
> Most folks do not realize how many legal
> professional would be out of work if
> drugs were legalized. Lawyers, bail bondsmen,
> judges, the treatment folks and
> on and on. For every drug dealer put out of
> business, nine other legitimate
> professionals would also be out of jobs. Ask any
> police chief if he would like
> his Federal drug interdition money cut! Bobby
>
>
> it is like prohibition in the 20's. it is not
> working
> to have them illeagle, only puts a high profit on
> them
> and draws criminals.
>
> --- Elizabeth Thiers <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
> > We could tax the wahoozy out of them like we do
> > tobacco and alcohol and
> > there could be laws protecting purity and
> content.
> > Free up a lot time for
> > more hard core criminals.
> >
>
>
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
|
|
|