Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 16 Jan 2005 10:31:49 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
[log in to unmask] wrote:
> ** *OK, Ken, now you tell us** why Mozart _would_ have killed 160,000
> people. And yes, I know that some relative of Schubert's was in the
> SS, but we're talking about Mozart.
> *
My Dear Ralph,
Mozart is not quite as large as the earth, though I am certain that you
may argue otherwise... he was a small small man. Proportionately his act
of unhuman massacre was an equivalent to that of the most recent tsunami
as when in 1782 he took a bath in preparation to wed Constanze Weber in
Vienna's St. Stephen's Cathedral (obligatory histo presto content, and a
structure the little man had several months earlier acoustically altered
by the removal of several non-essential interior columns) Mozart killed
off 4,356 insects and assorted bacteria that had accumulateed in his
hair. For such a small man this was a remarkable accomplishment.
][<
--
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>
|
|
|