PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Keith Thomas <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 18 Aug 2004 22:22:35 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 16:20:55 -0400, Don Wiss wrote:

>Keith Thomas wrote:
>
> > The point is, how would eggs have been eaten in
> > the Paleolithic (and they certainly were).
> > Eggs would have been seasonal - available for
> > 3 months max.  Eggs would have been mostly from
> > ground-nesting birds (swans, ducks etc.).
>
>And as we started as apes we were
>climbing trees long before we were walking on the ground.
>So earlier we would have simply been taking from tree nests.

Yes, but that would have been well before the Paleolithic.  Ground-nesting
birds also lay larger eggs (hence more attractive to Homo sapiens) than
the passerines.

>Also we evolved in warmer climes. Do birds only lay eggs for three months
>there? Chickens lay for more than three months. What about the wild
>versions of what our domesticated chickens evolved from?

Here I am only guessing, but I would expect that the ancestors of our
present poultry lay many more eggs than other wild birds of similar size:
pheasants, ravens, magpies, hawks, pigeons.

I should have added in my earlier post that, of course, eggs eaten by our
Paleolithic ancestors would generally be fertile and many would have well-
developed embryos.

Keith

ATOM RSS1 RSS2