Phil,
I do believe in Personal prophecy, and I new that was Prophecy when I read
that message from you, to Peggy.
Remember, the word "little" is often used as a way of showing affection.
<smile> I don't believe there was anything wrong with that message at all.
The Lord was speaking through you.
I'm praying for you, Phil.
Love and Blessings,
Pat Ferguson
At 12:14 AM 8/24/04, you wrote:
>What you read earlier was, what some call, personal prophecy. I don't care
>if you don't believe in such things and don't ask me to explain it because I
>can't. I don't often do what I did but when it happens, there is a reason.
>I rarely do it, overall, but that is beside the point. In Peggy's case, I
>cannot explain it nor do I care to try. When I wrote to her to let her know
>we are with her through this experience she is facing, I wrote the word
>"sister" and suddenly stopped typing. I could not go on. Saying the word
>"sister" was spiritually insufficient and not only that, it was spiritually
>wrong. It was not what I felt in my spirit. What I felt in my spirit was
>"little sister" but Peggy is not my little sister, I don't think anyhow. I
>backed up and typed in the word "little" in front of the word "sister" and
>felt stupid doing so. I sat for a moment and said, "Lord, that is stupid.
>What are we talking about here. So I began to write the rest of the
>message. No, it was not automatic writing; that is demonic. I knew every
>word I typed and why. If it makes you feel uncomfortable, I don't feel
>sorry for you because it wasn't written for you. What if you are wrong, I
>can hear someone asking. So? I've been wrong before. I wrote what I felt,
>not heard, but what I felt in my spirit. That's the best I can do and Jesus
>has to do the rest but I obeyed what He told me to do. No, I don't know
>Peggy personally. I've talked to her on the phone once or twice but a long
>time ago. You know her as well as I do if you are on this list. I know one
>thing. When I wrote that message, I felt God's love for Peggy flowing
>through me and that's all I am concerned about.
>
>Phil.
|