PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-15
Date:
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:06:33 +0800
Reply-To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
In-Reply-To:
<001501c3dad2$2b0d8700$96c28d0a@layton>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
So there isn't anything wrong with UNCURED bacon, is there?
If nitrites are the "enemy", then I think it's illogical to
cite bacon only; what about all other preserved meats?

Webster's defines bacon as:

   "The back and sides of a pig salted and smoked;
    formerly, the flesh of a pig salted or fresh."

So there is nothing in the definition of bacon that
says it has to have nitrites/ates in it. Bacon without
nitrites is still technically bacon.

IMHO, bacon is closer to paleo than other "meats"
like hotdogs, with all the extenders they have.


kylix

ATOM RSS1 RSS2