BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 13 Jul 2004 19:23:47 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (70 lines)
Thing is, it's a matter of opinion, I've heard a TS-2000 RX,  I thought it
was not as good as *my* 940, I say *my* 940 because I don't have the stock
filtering in mine and it may be that much better then stock I haven't used a
stock one in years, I do know when mine stopped working and I had to switch
to my 570, I couldn't stand the RX on it for over a week.  Oh well, it will
be a while before I get my 2000 unfortunately but I think I'll like it, if
it's still out when the time comes but I'll put a few things up for sale
after my vacation I August. I don't want to get in to that now, by the time
everything shipped and all I'll be away and that's when it will go bad and
if I don't reply for a couple weeks, that makes people mad.
----- Original Message -----
From: "k5in" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 6:51 PM
Subject: Re: kenwood ts2000


>     I have a couple of the TS-2000's radios and will say this: Receive
audio
> is great in comparison to the Ts-570 series.  Filtering, transmit audio is
> all better.  Yes, the TS-520 or TS-570 will get you there but the Cadillac
> is much more comfortable for the long haul and the short haul.  I don't
use
> the tnc or satellite capabilities but they are there too.  In fact my
Ts-940
> sits off to the side because the receive audio is much better on the
Ts-2000
> plus being able to punch a button and get the signal strength and other
> features are cool.  I know we were comparing Ts-570's and Ts-2000 series
of
> radios but I had to bring up the TS-940 which is one of the real tried and
> true radios with Kenwood audio but...  Now for the monetary difference I
> would much rather wait and have the Ts-2000 and wait a little longer to
save
> up for it than get the TS-570.  I've had both in my possession  and done
the
> side by side  checks.  The filtering on the IF-dsp is much better than the
> AF-filtering  Ts-570's plus your able to reject those annoying people that
> crowd in on you while in the middle of a QSO.  50 watts on UHF is good and
> of course there is the 100 watts on 2m and 6 meters.  I've made many many
> contacts on 6 meters using a small 3 element 6m beam and had many
> unsolicited compliments on my audio using the Heil Gold line mic that came
> with the radio.  Most of all is the accessibility of the TS-2000.  There
are
> some great people on this list that have written up button lay outs and
such
> for using the TS-2000.  Anyway, I think you know how I feel on the
> subject...  I am a total with absolute no vision by the way so I am
speaking
> from that stand point not one of a partial.  I just wanted to clarify so
no
> one misunderstands.
>
> Brian, k5in
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Richard and Karlene" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 7:40 AM
> Subject: kenwood ts2000
>
>
> Hi;
> I realize this is old news but briefly, what is the story with the Kenwood
> ts2000?  Other than the fact that we have 2 meters and 440 in the same
> package as the hf radio what else do we gain?  Does the vs3 give you more
> info than you get with the 570?
> I never seriously looked because it seemed a bit out of my price range.
> Rich
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2