Folks:

I agree with Terri here.

I know this isn't a computer users' list-serve, but it is a blindhams list
serve, and since we all use computers for ham radio and other applications,
the topic seems relevant to me.

Personally, I really appreciate the dialogue, and, as someone earlier said,
if something isn't of interest, just hit the good old delete button.

I myself am going to be switching to Windows XP and Jaws 5.0 both at work
and at home this summer, and really appreciate knowing that a bunch of
down-to-earth people are available on this list to help with those questions
that crop up from time to time.

So, in my oppinion, thanks, guys!

Best 73 from Tom Behler:  KB8TYJ

----- Original Message -----
From: "Terri Pannett" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 11:46 PM
Subject: Re: JAWS vs. Window-Eyes


> I think the thread is interesting.  Have you noticed there are more
> questions about how to get JAWS to do this or that than WindowEyes?  It
> implies WE either does the job better or is easier to learn how to use.
>
> You can always relate screen readers to ham radio if you want to use them
> for reading Packet or Pactor or how about comparing screen readers when
you
> want to program a radio using your PC.
>
> Terri, Amateur radio call sign KF6CA.  Army MARS call sign AAT9PX,
> California
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 5:09 PM
> Subject: Re: JAWS vs. Window-Eyes
>
>
> > Not much I admit but their are really thoughtful and smart people up
here.
> > Besides, does every qso have to only discuss rig antenna and RST?
> >