Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 9 Feb 2005 00:01:21 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Again Gary & Steve;
Steve is absolutely right.
I found that generally it is best to install the newest software.
Many times the bugs are worked out of it and, the security whole are also,
plugged up.
Take care.
73 De Anthony W2AJV
[log in to unmask]
ECHOLINK NODE NUMBER: 74389
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 11:08 PM
Subject: Re: Xp-home
> Nah, Gary, it doesn't put you closer to the Pro version.
>
> Let me put it simply: If you want continued security and support updates
> from
> Microsoft, you need SP2. I've installed it on three machines with no
> problems
> with JFw. I do know some folks who have had problems, but by and large,
> there
> haven't been many. It gives you much better security, and protection
> against
> pop-ups than SP1 that I wouldn't hesitate to advise installing it.
>
> Steve
> K8SP
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "tillfam3" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 10:31 PM
> Subject: Xp-home
>
>
> Hi All. Getting ready to upgrade to Xp home. I understand that I can use
> the current application of JAWS. I have heard of someone adding the
> service
> pack two to their XP home addition. Should I stay away from this??? For
> I
> have heard that it puts you closer to XP-Pro, Is that right?? Thanks to
> all if you can shed some light.. Gary KB2YAA
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.6 - Release Date: 2/7/2005
>
>
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.6 - Release Date: 2/7/2005
|
|
|