Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 25 Feb 2003 10:41:31 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
All,
I agree with Terry, the environment seen by a digital camera is going to be
much more varriable than that seen by a scanner. Even with scanners,
just think how often you need sighted help to fiddle with contrast etc to get
a good OCR.
I think there will need to be a software process which either makes adjustments
to the camera's focus and/or apature etc. or combines several saptures to
get an image which can be OCR'd.
I asked the PRD-2 manufacturers about such problems along with
the needs for exact focus, field size, and stability to get a clean scann
and so far have no replies.
It will probably happen, maybe fairly soon, but I bet it won't
be the panacia some hope it will.
there aren't any miracles anyhow, just incremental changes, sometimes for
the better.
Tom Fowle
VICUG-L is the Visually Impaired Computer User Group List.
To join or leave the list, send a message to
[log in to unmask] In the body of the message, simply type
"subscribe vicug-l" or "unsubscribe vicug-l" without the quotations.
VICUG-L is archived on the World Wide Web at
http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/vicug-l.html
|
|
|