Gee!  I guess I wouldn't read much as very few radios these days are
affordable! (smirk)

Mike Freeman

----- Original Message -----
From: "shawn klein" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2003 3:42 PM
Subject: Re: untitled posts


> I agree with you. Especially since the subject is
> often all I read. If I'm not interested in a
> particular subject because I don't own nor can I
> afford the radio, or I'm not using a linksys router I
> delete the message because if I read every message on
> every list I'd have no time for anything else, so when
> I click on a no subject and find something that I have
> no interest in I do a mental *ug*. Cause I wasted all
> that time downloading it when I could have deleted it
> and I'm sure y'all do the same thing. Subjects are
> important if you want your messages read. They're like
> the window displays in stores.
> or CQ's on the air. If you get on 20 hoping to talk to
> a j a, but you just call a general CQ, you probably
> won't get a j a comming back on the first try.
> --- Jim Stevenson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > Why so many subject lines get lost?
> >
> > Why those who reply do not add them back again?
> >
> > Why so many not specific subjects like
> > help?
> >
> > Thanks much again as always.
> >
> > 73
> > wb6 yoy
> >
> > (650) 604-5720
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing.
> http://photos.yahoo.com/
>
>