Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | St. John's University Cerebral Palsy List |
Date: | Fri, 25 Mar 2005 07:22:38 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Which is disturbing not just for this case but, for so many others.
Beth th
-----Original Message-----
From: St. John's University Cerebral Palsy List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of ken barber
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 7:40 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Terri Schiavo redux from Inclusion Daily Express
actually those are reasons that they should not have juristriction, but,
article 3 lets congress set the juristrictions of the federal courts, that
was my question of the improper use of this article and it was not addressed
and left out there, congress may try this again since that issue was not
addressed and settled.
--- Elizabeth Thiers <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> There are several reasons congress and US federal courts do not have
> juristiction in this case. Briefly, two of the biggest are that a
> state has the right to define medical best practice (intrastate
> commerce, it's what we get our state licensure laws from) and each
> state has the right to define the rights between a man and a woman as
> husband and wife. I find the case very disturbing on any count.
> Trust me, I would be fighting just as hard if a husband was trying to
> keep her alive. It's there choice.
> Bobby, I know what your saying, we probably have similar very
> theoretical, unproven theories behind the bulimia issues. But, as is,
> there are enough accusations and theories out there.
>
> Beth T.
|
|
|