Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - C-PALSY Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

C-PALSY Archives

Cerebral Palsy List

C-PALSY@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
C-PALSY Home C-PALSY Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Action Alert to Oppose S. 2061
From:
- Joy - <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
St. John's University Cerebral Palsy List
Date:
Sat, 21 Feb 2004 21:16:36 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
I agree with your stance on the issue, but this letter is very poorly
worded.  First of all, not everyone who feels passionately about these
issues is "the caregiver to a child with cerebral palsy".  People with
disabilities (and other non-disabled friends and family) would also be
willing to take action on this, but this letter excludes them.  It also
disempowers people with disabilities from advocating on their own behalf.
Also, I resent the implication that the cap would "make us victims twice".
I don't consider myself a victim, and by sending this letter to legislators,
the organization is perpetuating a stereotype that is pervasive and
inaccurate.  While I recognize that action alerts are often drafted quickly
to accommodate the time-sensitive nature of the issue, I encourage you to
reconsider the wording used here.

Joy Welan

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV