I agree, I find jaws to work better with what I use, office apps, and a few
other things I tried it with so that's why I made my choice, an agency
bought it for me, and they gave me my choice, I tried both demos and gave
them y choice and don't regret it though I did see a lot of good points with
WE, JFW just did what I want better.
John Miller N1UMJ
Owner of J. E. M. Racing http://home.comcast.net/~jemracing5/wsb/index.html
AIM screen name: JEMracing3
MSN messenger: [log in to unmask]
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 8:59 PM
Subject: Re: Bad Job With ULS License Renewal
| Since both progs cost a significant amount of money, I'd try to evalu both
of
| them. Personally, I prefer JFW as it works much better with MS Office
apps
| and MSN, but as was mentioned, each has pluses and minueses.
| Steve, K8SP
| ----- Original Message -----
| From: "Will Smith" <[log in to unmask]>
| To: <[log in to unmask]>
| Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 8:38 PM
| Subject: Re: Bad Job With ULS License Renewal
|
|
| Hi all,
|
| I agree with the comments made here, with this added point:
|
| Window Eyes and Window Eyes Pro costs a few hundred dollars less than JFW.
|
| If you are spending your own money as I did then this is a significant
| consideration. Also, I don't like the JFW copy protection scheme. Others
| live with it, but I am glad not to have to worry with it.
|
| JFW does work slightly better when dealing with columns and tables, but
| this is of no concern for my computer use. And I think Window Eyes works
| better for my web useage.
|
| Will K4SAY
| [log in to unmask]
|
| [log in to unmask]
| On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Louis Kim Kline wrote:
|
| > Hi Bob.
| >
| > I think you will get passionate endorsements on both of the major screen
| > readers, and the JAWS users will swear up and down that JAWS is best,
and
| > the Window-Eyes users will swear up and down that Window-Eyes is best.
| >
| > In reality, I think you will find either one to be a considerable
| > improvement over the screen reader that is built into Zoomtext. The
| > reality is that both have strengths and weaknesses. For my own use, I
like
| > JAWS, but that is because it fits my style of computer operation a
little
| > better. I could certainly do the job with Window-Eyes.
| >
| etc.
|
