Ken sez:
>> You just said the same thing I said.   Notice that I said "Paleo Diet"
>> with capitals, indicating a diet plan for current humans.

I supported the second part, not the first. But, we have been properly
chastised for pursuing this, so I guess I'll stop.

And forgive me for not reading into your caps the "official" modern version
of the diet :)

William sez:
>> Strawberries found in supermarket are NOT food. Stawberries found in my
>> front yard are edible (and taste much better), but I'd starve depending
>> on them for food.

Um, forgive my bluntness, but that's a ridiculous statement.

Somebody else sez:
>> But this is at best an example of micro-evolution, a minor change in
>> old 'predator-prey' strategies. No new species of cat is likely to
<snip>

That's why I mentioned micro-evolution. A "better" duck (or cat), but not a
new one. ("Better" is not a good word in this context because of it's
subjectivity. But it will suffice for now :)

William queries:
>> The idea of paleofood list is that we have not adapted. Am I mistaken?

Is that we have not adapted to non-paleo foods (grains, beans, dairy,
modern processed foods).