Kendall,
Agreed. It's my personal opinion that Ralph Nader was the main reason for
Dole losing the election in 2000 and he revels in being a spoiler for the
Democrats. I used to respect him but no longer.
A friend and I were coming back from lunch just now and he said he is voting
for Kerry as az protest against Bush rather than a preference for Kerry. We
both agree any vote for Kerry is a vote to get Bush out of office.
Of course, I'm not demanding that you vote for Kerry but I do urge you all
to not waste a vote against Bush if you don't want to see him continue in
office.
Kat
>On Fri, 01 Oct 2004 09:36:47 -0600 Kendall David Corbett <[log in to unmask]>
wrote.
>Trisha,
>
>Kermit or Ralph Nader? The end result would be the same; a vote for an
>unelectable candidate that would take a vote away from Kerry. Had it
>not been for Nader four years ago, this thread would not exist.
>
>I believe in an open mind, but not so open that your brains fall out.
>-Arthur Hays Sulzberger
>
>Kendall
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Trisha Cummings [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 8:18 AM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: [C-PALSY] [DGV] Halting Progress for the Disabled (fwd)
>
>Hi Mike,
>
> Frankly, I am all for Kermit the Frog - the problem is that takes
>away votes from Kerry and we will end up with another 4 years of being a
>laughing stock of the world and screwing our economy up to the point we
>will end up a third world country.
>
> Trisha
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: St. John's University Cerebral Palsy List
>[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Mike Collis
>Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 11:13 AM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: [DGV] Halting Progress for the Disabled (fwd)
>
>
>I'm going to right in someone's name, as a protest vote. I mean, 247
>million citizens, and these are the best 2 we can come up with?
>
>Mike
>
>Tag: Warning! This Powerchair has an attitude problem!!!
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: St. John's University Cerebral Palsy List
>[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of ken barber
>Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 11:46 PM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: [DGV] Halting Progress for the Disabled (fwd)
>
>well mike, i'd have a great problem reconciling most
>politicians to the sermon on the mount. john kerry
>gets closer, you think? i don't.
>you going to write in someone or not vote at all?
>
>--- Trisha Cummings <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> Ummm, that covers a lot of territory - including
>> the Golden Rule - =
>> what in particular are you thinking?=20
>>
>> Trisha
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Mike Collis [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 3:40 PM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: [DGV] Halting Progress for the Disabled
>> (fwd)
>>
>>
>> You know what my whole beef is with Bush and why I
>> can't support him?
>> He has never shown me how his policies reconcile
>> with the Sermon on the
>> Mount. Can it be done?
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> Tag: Warning! This Powerchair has an attitude
>> problem!!!
>>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________
>Do you Yahoo!?
>Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
>http://vote.yahoo.com
>
|
