Mime-Version: |
1.0 (Apple Message framework v606) |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 26 Nov 2003 13:00:57 -0600 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-1--775739544 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I was planning on leaving you in charge of selecting the punishment
Ralph. On account of how tolerant, patient and sensitive you are.
-jc
On Nov 25, 2003, at 11:37 AM, [log in to unmask] wrote:
> In a message dated 11/25/2003 9:30:29 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> [log in to unmask] writes:
> Not all
> buildings are so intuitively navigated that signage is a secondary
> feature. However, if the signage is necessary for a reasonable person
> to navigate the building, the designer should be dealt with...harshly.
> How harshly? Should they be let loose in their own building?
> That punishment may well fit the crime, but it probably also would
> count as cruel and unusual.
>
> Ralph
|
|
|