Hello listers,
Yesterday, I reinstalled Text-to-Audio on my new PC. I had had little success with it so far, and I have never succeeded to get answers from the technical support at Reading Made Easy. So, I shallask my peers:
It seems to work better now that I have a Pentium 4 and Win XP. However, when I converted text to MP3, using an AT&T 16 bits voice, I was again disappointed by the recording quality of the result. I can't compare it to so many other text-to-speech programs, but compared to Total Recorder recording of a voice reading a text in a word processor, for instance, it is much worse! Is that normal? Which format gives the best quality to space ratio? I used Mp3 in stereo, with 44,1 kHz.
I can't really explain what is bad in the recording, it is as if the voice is a bit in the background, and not as clear as when it talks directly from my PC as Jaws does. I think I have version 6 of text-to-audio.
        Thank you very much in advance for any advice, have a nice afternoon,

Best regards
Séverine Renard
Employée commerciale 
[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>  

INTEGRA 
tel. +32 16 35 31 30
http://www.integra-belgium.com <http://www.integra-belgium.com/>  

Integra: van consulent tot partner in hulpmiddelen!
Integra: du conseil à l'achat des aides techniques!


VICUG-L is the Visually Impaired Computer User Group List.
To join or leave the list, send a message to
[log in to unmask]  In the body of the message, simply type
"subscribe vicug-l" or "unsubscribe vicug-l" without the quotations.
 VICUG-L is archived on the World Wide Web at
http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/vicug-l.html