Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 13 Jun 2003 02:02:15 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
--- Craig Coonrad <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, Eva Hedin wrote:
>
> given enough
> time (10, 20, or 100,000
> years) a population of humans would exist that
> thrive on Budweiser and
> Mcdonalds.
>
You may be right for Budweiser, but one problem with
this is that to create natural selection, a problem
has to kill people before they reach childbearing age.
Budweiser may in rare cases do that, but generally
speaking the effect of a McDonalds diet is probably
going to manifest itself as whether we die at the age
of 55 or 75, and hence I doubt that it would push us
to adapt to it. We can actually fare quite well on a
diet of McDonalds, unfortunately, although we get
burdened with all the problems like diabetes and CHD
that accompany it. Speaking theoretically (I'm not a
eugenicist at all) the human species is essentially in
a position where it is difficult for evolutionary
pressure to work on us.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM).
http://calendar.yahoo.com
|
|
|