PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 5 Feb 2004 17:04:32 -0500
Reply-To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
From:
Neil Abrahams <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
Quoting Diana Moskal <[log in to unmask]>:

>  So
> what is the consensus about sweet potatoes?
> Thanks,
> Dee
>
Dee, I can't presume to know of any 'consensus,' but it's the lower nutrient
density, and the higher glycemic index, as well as the likelihood that starchy
roots and tubers weren't much eaten by our early ancestors, that's responsible
for the proscription.  But those are recommendations only.

Neil

ATOM RSS1 RSS2