PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 20 Jan 2004 07:18:46 -0600
Reply-To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Organization:
www.roadtowellsville.com
From:
Jay Banks <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (142 lines)
Of course when you figure in the hit on nutrition from cooking,
or even just keeping the food in your refrigerator for a week
or so, some of the raw-food advocates start to make a little
sense (but lord knows nobody dare mention eating uncooked
food around here...that is on par with advocating necrophilia
for some reason).

With all of the methods of depleting the nutrition from our
foods, however, it is important to realize that our food lacks
a lot of nutrition to begin with...and what tiny bit is left, is
lost in the cooking/processing/refrigeration stage. It is little
wonder our hospitals are running over with sick people.
In fact, the wonder isn't that some of us have gotten
sick, the wonder is that any of us are still alive!  -- Jay


-=-=-=-=-=


BREAKING NEWS from globeandmail.com, Saturday, July 6, 2002

Today's fruits, vegetables lack yesterday's nutrition

By ANDRE PICARD From Saturday's Globe and Mail

Fruits and vegetables sold in Canadian supermarkets today contain far
fewer nutrients than they did 50 years ago, according to an analysis
conducted by The Globe and Mail and CTV News.

Vital vitamins and minerals have dramatically declined in some of our
most popular foods, including potatoes, tomatoes, bananas and apples,
the analysis reveals.

Find out more about what you eat

Take the potato, by far the most consumed food in Canada. The average
spud has lost 100 per cent of its vitamin A, which is important for good
eyesight; 57 per cent of its vitamin C and iron, a key component of
healthy blood; and 28 per cent of its calcium, essential for building
healthy bones and teeth.

It also lost 50 per cent of its riboflavin and 18 per cent of its
thiamine. Of the seven key nutrients measured, only niacin levels have
increased.

The story is similar for 25 fruits and vegetables that were analyzed.
But Health Canada refused to comment on the findings, saying the debate
was an academic one.

The academics, for their part, are intrigued, but not alarmed.

Modern farming methods, long-haul transportation and crop-breeding
practices are all believed to be contributing to the drop in vitamins
and minerals.

Phil Warman, an agronomist and professor of agricultural sciences at
Nova Scotia Agricultural College, said there is no doubt the nutritional
content of food is different today, due to the emphasis on producing
cheap food.

"The emphasis is on appearance, storability and transportability, and
there has been much less emphasis on the nutritional value of fruits and
vegetables," he said.

Dr. Warman said crops are bred to produce higher yields, to be resistant
to disease and to produce more visually attractive fruits and
vegetables, but little or no emphasis is placed on their vitamin or
mineral content.

While there is little evidence, anecdotal or otherwise, that the changes
are resulting in major nutritional deficiencies in the general
population, Dr. Warman emphasized that consumers should care about the
issue because it is the nutrients, not the appearance, that give food
value.

"I care because I want to eat a product that is as high in nutritional
value as possible. Otherwise, I would eat sawdust with nitrogen
fertilizer," he said.

Tim Lang, a professor at the Centre for Food Policy in London, England,
agreed. "It's an issue of consumer rights," he said. "We think of an
orange as a constant, but the reality is it isn't."

In fact, you would have to eat eight oranges today to get the same
amount of vitamin A your grandparents got from a single orange. And you
would need to eat five to get the same level of iron. However, the
amount of vitamin C has increased slightly.

Dr. Lang said declining nutrient levels may prove to be a health issue
because we are only beginning to understand how important micronutrients
are to disease prevention. "The argument that it doesn't matter because
we overconsume is complacent. . . . Nutrient density might also be
important."

Alison Stephen, director of research at the Heart and Stroke Foundation
of Canada, said the biggest nutritional problem is that most Canadians
do not eat anywhere near the recommended five to 10 servings of fruits
and vegetables daily.

But she is not unduly worried about today's consumers failing to get
their required vitamins and minerals. "A lot of our foods today are
fortified milk, bread, apple juice, cereal," she said.

In other words, grains and dairy products are far more important sources
of essential nutrients than they were in the past.

To conduct the analysis, The Globe and Mail and CTV examined food tables
that were prepared by government researchers in 1951, 1972 and 1999, and
compared the nutrients available from 100 grams of the given food.

The results were almost identical to similar research conducted in the
United States and Britain. The U.K. research was published in the
British Food Journal, a peer-reviewed, scientific publication, while the
U.S. data have been published only in alternative-health journals.

According to the Canadian data, almost 80 per cent of foods tested
showed drops in calcium and iron; three-quarters saw drops in vitamin A,
and half lost vitamin C and riboflavin; one-third lost thiamine and 12
per cent lost niacin.

But some experts said the explanation for the decline might be found in
testing and sampling methods.

Len Piche, an associate professor of nutrition at Brescia College in
London, Ont., questioned the accuracy of the numbers, saying testing
methods were not great in 1951, so we may only now be getting a true
idea of the nutrients in fruits and vegetables. "Did they really go
down, or do we just have better techniques for analyzing those
nutrients?" he wondered.

However, Dr. Piche said the issue is one Health Canada should examine.
"If there's a problem, I'm confident the government will take it
seriously and do the necessary research to address it," he said.

In the analysis, the biggest loser was broccoli, a food that epitomizes
the dictates of healthy eating. All seven of its measurable nutrients
declined, notably calcium, which fell 63 per cent, and iron, which
dropped 34 per cent. Broccoli is often cited as an excellent source of
calcium and iron.

With a report from Avis Favaro

ATOM RSS1 RSS2