C-PALSY Archives

Cerebral Palsy List

C-PALSY@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-transfer-encoding:
7BIT
Sender:
"St. John's University Cerebral Palsy List" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Date:
Tue, 6 Jul 2004 19:20:44 -0400
MIME-version:
1.0
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Reply-To:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (83 lines)
I've noticed that many people--self included--are becoming single-issue voters.  If not single issue, then at least they feel passion for a few issues.  A real conundrum when one party embraces one of your "pet" issues and the other party agrees with you on a different, but no less important, item.

Kyle

----- Original Message -----
From: ken barber <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tuesday, July 6, 2004 11:45 am
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: hope you had a good day.

> well kat, my number 1 issue is the war on terror. tell
> me specifically what john f kerry is going to do
> differently. please no general statements about going
> to the U.N. AND GETTING ALONG WITH OUR BUDDIES. i am
> not for treating terror as a law enforcement issue. i
> am for treating these people like we did hitler and
> destroy them. even in world war 2 no one was killed in
> the heartland, but, now we do have to worry about our
> family being killed here in atalanta georgia. what is
> kerry going to do?
>
> --- Kathy <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > Sorry, but I have to err on the side of
> > practicality.  I'd rather vote for
> > Kerry as a vote against Bush.  Would you throw away
> > a vote against Bush to
> > keep him for four more years?
> >
> > Just think - four more years of Bush means chances
> > for our choice will dwindle
> > down to nil.
> >
> > For the record, I do agree with you about being
> > pro-choice as I am pro-choice
> > myself, but I think there is a bigger picture to
> > consider.
> >
> > Kat
> >
> > On Tuesday 06 July 2004 12:14 am, - Joy - wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Ken wrote:
> > > <<since we are politicing, i noticed with intrest
> > that john kerry made a
> > > statement that he believed life started at
> > conception and not a peep from
> > > NOW..>>
> > >
> > > Some of you might remember that I'm very
> > politically active and very
> > > involved in the women's rights movement, so this
> > is something that I've
> > > been following closely.  It's true that Kerry said
> > that.  However, in the
> > > same interview, he also said: ""I can't take my
> > Catholic belief, my article
> > > of faith, and legislate it on a Protestant or a
> > Jew or an atheist.  We have
> > > separation of church and state in the United
> > States of America."  As a
> > > pro-choice voter, I have absolutely no problem
> > with his position.  He can
> > > believe whatever he wants about the morality of
> > abortion, as long as he
> > > doesn't try to impose his moral beliefs on my
> > body.  I believe that NOW and
> > > the other women's rights groups feel the same way.
> >  After all, we're
> > > pro-CHOICE, not pro-abortion.
> > >
> > > ~Joy~
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
> http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2