And while we're at it, let's make the subject relevant to the topic of the
message.  For example, I saw a post on this list that looked like a reply
to a question about the TH-F6a, but was actually about trading non-related
equipment.  I know how easy it is to simply reply to a message without
fixing the subject, but it sure is annoying when you're trying to sort out
what you want to read.

Steve

On Sunday 12/14/03 18:42 shawn klein wrote:
>I agree with you. Especially since the subject is
>often all I read. If I'm not interested in a
>particular subject because I don't own nor can I
>afford the radio, or I'm not using a linksys router I
>delete the message because if I read every message on
>every list I'd have no time for anything else, so when
>I click on a no subject and find something that I have
>no interest in I do a mental *ug*. Cause I wasted all
>that time downloading it when I could have deleted it
>and I'm sure y'all do the same thing. Subjects are
>important if you want your messages read. They're like
>the window displays in stores.
>or CQ's on the air. If you get on 20 hoping to talk to
>a j a, but you just call a general CQ, you probably
>won't get a j a comming back on the first try.
>--- Jim Stevenson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > Why so many subject lines get lost?
> >
> > Why those who reply do not add them back again?
> >
> > Why so many not specific subjects like
> > help?
> >
> > Thanks much again as always.
> >
> > 73
> > wb6 yoy
> >
> > (650) 604-5720
>
>
>__________________________________
>Do you Yahoo!?
>New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing.
>http://photos.yahoo.com/