Hello my Friend, I have used the Ft1000MP in field day and very nice rig to
use on CW. I am actually pretty active on 20 and 40 meter CW and honestly
just had very little luck working you guys over there in England. Really was
looking forward to getting into the group and truly wanted to. The activity
wasn't the problem but i guess being at the right place and the right time.
I use about 100 watts and ground mounted vertical. Have a pipeline into S51
and Eastern Europe as talk to guys over there every day. maybe will get
another chance sometime in the future. Thanks for good wishes, 73, Dave
W4CI
----- Original Message -----
From: "David W Wood" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2003 1:51 AM
Subject: Re: Tentec Radios
> Kevin and Dave
>
> the filtering for CW in the Tentek rigs is superior to the TS2000 and
> certainly the TS570, which even with the 250Hz filter installed, as I
> have in mine, the front end is like a door for a 747 hanger!
>
> The cleanliness of the transmitted tone is superb on the Tentek rigs,
> and less harsh than that on the TS2000.
>
> Tentek are notoriously inaccessible unfortunately, but I agree with Dave
> that occasionally a trade-off has to be made. On that basis, I use an
> FT1000mp in my main shack.
> The TS2000 at my /p QTH the TS570 is my reserve and portable rig.
>
> The later Icom rigs are notably bad at receiving CW.
>
> Sorry about the unsolicited ancillary comments, but thought they may be
> of interest.
>
> I can't say anything about SSB as I have only had half a dozen or so
> QSOs using that mode among the 15000 in my PC log.
>
> Incidentally Dave, pity you didn't get on the air to join FOC.
>
> 73 de G3YXX
>
>
> In message <[log in to unmask]>, Dave
> Hillebrandt <[log in to unmask]> writes
> >hi, never used the newest, but do own an omni 6 plus and like it very
much.
> >i understand the orion is tremendous but never even seen one. The one
thing
> >i can say about the omni is that it does all that they say it will and
> >recevier is tremendous. in saying this, it is not the most accessable in
the
> >world, something i don't care for. i have a TS570DG and can access every
> >menu option easily via speech and on the ten tec the only thing i can
access
> >with speech is the frequency readout. Guess there is always a trade off
in
> >life but i don't like it. Wish i could have both but feel that the ten
tec
> >recever is worth the loss in accessability at this point. never used a
> >TS2000 and understand it is a very nice rig but not sure how the
receiever
> >compares. The filters on CW are quite a pleasure to use and its DSP does
> >seem to work as well as noise blanker etc. 73, Dave W4CI
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Nathan, Kevin" <[log in to unmask]>
> >To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2003 6:57 PM
> >Subject: Tentec Radios
> >
> >
> >> HI All,
> >>
> >> I have recently seen a thread on here about Tentec rigs but wonder if
> >> someone has experience using any of the newer ones and how they compare
in
> >> features, accessibility and quality to say the Kenwood TS-2000 which I
> >run.
> >> I just know very little about them and am curious.
> >>
> >> Thanks much and 73.
> >> Kevin, K7RX
> >>
> >> Kevin Nathan, Independent Living Coordinator
> >> Dept. of Services for the Blind
> >> 3411 S. Alaska
> >> Seattle, Wa 98118
> >> Voice: (206) 721-6450
> >> Cell: (206) 604-4767
> >> Toll Free: (800) 552-7103
> >> Fax: (206) 721-6403
> >> Email: [log in to unmask]
>
> --
> David W Wood
|
