Mime-Version: |
1.0 (Apple Message framework v546) |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Sep 2003 11:00:25 -0600 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Saturday, September 13, 2003, at 09:12 AM, Barry Groves wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I take a very different route, although I too recommend in ratios. In
> my
> case, as it is far healthier for fat to be the major source of fuel as
> it
> was in palaeolithic times and in more recent primitive cultures, I
> recommend
> 10-15% of calories from carbs, mainly from fresh green and yellow
> veges,
> 15-25% of calories from good quality animal proteins, and 60-70% of
> calories
> from fats, again mainly from animal sources.
but what does this look like in terms of proportions? The
calorie-model is inefficient for most people to determine dietary
ratios - its far to reductionist for something as innate as eating...
Todd Caldecott
[log in to unmask]
http://www.wrc.net/phyto
|
|
|