BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ruth Barton <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Kitty tortillas! <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 2 Aug 2003 22:51:25 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
Hi John,  I don't know about the others but the headwaters of the
Connecticut river are the Connecticut lakes in northern New Hampshire.  I
have never been up there but would like to go sometime when it's not
mosquito or black fly season.  But I don't want it to be cold either.
Ain't I picky.  Ruth



At 2:26 PM -0500 8/2/03, John Callan wrote:
Please Ralph.  Spare me the details.  Normally covered anotomical parts and
geometric shapes don't belong in the same sentence, let alone hyphenated
into a single word.

Some exhibit I saw up Nort pointed out that no one seems to make much of a
fuss about the headwaters of the Ohio, or the Missouri...both of which are
arguably more significant than the Mississippi, in terms of volume or
commerce, beyond the points where they seperate from the lower Mississippi.
So I got to wondering...where ARE the headwaters of the Ohio, the Missouri,
the Hudson, the Connecticut and them other big rivers?  Can you have your
picture taken sitting in the middle?  Are they small enough that if Ralph
were to sit in the middle it would wreck the downstream economy?

--
Ruth Barton
[log in to unmask]
Dummerston, VT

--
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2