Sender: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 17 Oct 2003 11:34:41 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
<3F8F3A7A.28191.6913CEF3@localhost> |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
We are investigating adding wireless network access. In the course of
comparing various products it came to our attention that the U.S. Robotics
wireless router was available for about $70. after a rebate, but that the
comparable U.S. Robotics wireless access point costs about $190. The two
are very similar in features and in physical design. In our network
geography, the router must be installed in a location that doesn't lend
itself to extended coverage. A much better location is available for an
access point that would require but a single Ethernet connection. Is there
some reason why one seeking just the wireless network access feature could
not purchase the less-expensive router, install it in the better location,
but connect and use it only as an access point?
Tommy Holmes, Jr.
[log in to unmask]
713.621.5666
The NOSPIN Group is now offering Free PC Tech
support at our newest website:
http://freepctech.com
|
|
|