i have not replied to anything today, i have just
read. but, sorry micheal, my only beef with bush is
that he has not been tough enough. hell if i were
president, i'd have kicked the u.n.'s but out of new
york long ago.
  i don't think i have been wrong at all. except in
not replying to all the dribble that i see.
--- Michael Collis <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Kat, remember, I was totally against Bush becoming
> president,  and now
> the birds have come down to roost..  I hate to say
> it, but half the time
> the conservaves are wrong about things (sorry, Ken),
> and the other half
> of the time, the liberals are wrong.
>
> kat wrote:
>
> >You're only saying what I've been feeling since the
> election, Mike.
> >
> >Kat
> >
> >On Monday 29 September 2003 04:05 pm, you wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I did not like Bush for his Christian
> conservatism.  Any time a
> >>politician uses God in order to get elected, nine
> times out of ten it's
> >>a Machavellian ploy. (Boy., do I sound like a
> cynic here, or what?) :-(
> >>
> >>BG Greer, PhD wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Sadly, it seems the Bush foriegn policy, despite
> Colin Powell's effort is
> >>>to p*ss the entire world off. N. Korea is much
> more of a threat than
> >>>Iraq, but there is little oil in N Korea.
> >>>
> >>>      It is hilarious that he is going to
> "convince" the UN to help in
> >>>Iraq. And the reason we have been free of
> terrorism in this country is
> >>>that the terrorists have not made a concerted
> effort yet.
> >>>
> >>>      The more I hear of Bush the more disgusted
> I am.
> >>>
> >>>Bobby
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>I think it's very ironic that Bush is seeking
> aid from the very body he
> >>>>scorned a year ago.  He's realising all too well
> that America can no
> >>>>longer afford to act on its own and we cannot
> operate in a vacuum.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >
> >
> >


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com