Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 24 Jul 2003 08:37:27 -0400 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Mike,
What I don;t understand is why they don't use cat scans and MRI's. Cat scans can make individual slice pictures looks like that would give a better view of a tumor or growth and its primeters.
Trisha
> How come??? If they can tsake sonargrams of developing babies, they
> should be able to do the same for cancer.
>
> [log in to unmask] wrote:
>
> >It is here, just beginning to use ultra-sound for breast exams, but it is
> >very expensive I hear.
> >
> >~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >I am available to do writing, editing, reporting, designing jobs, including
> >business cards, etc. I am also a disability rights activist.
> >~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> >
> >
|
|
|