I'm cynical enough to believe there ain't no such animal, although I'd love
to think there is at least one.

Kat

----- Original Message -----
From: "Barber, Kenneth L." <[log in to unmask]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.c-palsy
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 1:36 PM
Subject: Re: Iraq


> A political person who is above the attraction of money?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kat [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 10:41 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Iraq
>
> *Raises eyebrow*
>
> One would sincerely hope a member of the UN would be above such personal
> monetary considerations.
>
> But then even *I* realise that when a lot of money comes into play,
> principles can fly out the window.
>
> Kat
>
> -------Original Message-------
> From: "Cleveland, Kyle E." <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: 03/10/03 10:32 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Iraq
>
> >
> > Here's a thought (not my idea--I heard it from a "talking head" on the
> news
> before I left for work):
>
> Could it be that Hans Blix, who stands a good chance at getting a Nobel
> Prize next year, did not relay the information about the latest missile
> find--and some other "French Connections"--because he stands to lose a
> million bucks prize money if we go to war?
>
> Food for thought...
>
> -Kyle
> >