EASI Archives

Equal Access to Software & Information: (distribution list)

EASI@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Prof Norm Coombs <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
* EASI: Equal Access to Software & Information
Date:
Tue, 24 Jun 2003 10:46:18 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (108 lines)
I was at a meeting in Maine re the mac computers for school where the Apple
rep either was totally arogant and ignorant or just lied to us.At 03:23 PM
6/17/2003 -0400, you wrote:
>>>>
Jim, I'm currently trying to do what you suggest, that is to have vendors
come forward publically and disclose their experiences with Apple.  Within
Maine, however, Apple accepted an RFP which called for the provision of
accessible devices.  In my mind, passing the responsibility of that
accessibility off to a third party vendor is risky at best and, now that
Alva is discontinuing development/support for the one product which
provided a degree of accessibility to blind folks, I don't feel that Apple
remains in compliance with the RFP.  Admittedly, the issue in Maine differs
from the more global issue of where the responsibility for providing access
lies.  All I know is that, while these issues get sorted out, blind kids
are unable to be truely mainstreamed as they are unable to use their shiny
new iBooks here in Maine.

Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: * EASI: Equal Access to Software & Information
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jim Tobias
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 2:49 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Alva ceases development of outspoken and enlarge for macintosh

 Hi All,

 Well, I don't know what kind of cooperation is needed.  I'm not a Mac
developer, so I don't know how public everything about the Mac is.  On the
surface, there are thousands of other third-party products for MacOS, some
with pretty small markets themselves.  So either everyone else is getting
the right kind of cooperation and Apple is self-destructively ignoring the
AT world, or AT requires some sort of special cooperation, or there is
something else going on (possibly in addition to a cooperation problem).
Can the "other developers" you mention be persuaded to tell us what they
are not getting?  When Windows AT companies were not being let into the
Windows development cycle early enough, they made a semi-public stink about
it.

 I'm not trying to let Apple off the hook, just trying to understand where
Apple's legal responsibility ends.  There are similar cases elsewhere in
the land of "AT and UD".  For example, some combinations of digital
wireless phones and hearing aids create noisy interference.  Should the
phones emit less RF, or should the hearing aids be more immune, or both?

*****
Jim Tobias
Inclusive Technologies
[log in to unmask]
732.441.0831 v/tty
www.inclusive.com


 -----Original Message-----
From: * EASI: Equal Access to Software & Information
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Steven M. Sawczyn
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 12:45 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Alva ceases development of outspoken and enlarge for mackintosh

 I don't doubt that other developers are interested in developing screen
readers for the Mac, however, the feedback I've gotten is that Apple isn't
generally supportive of these development efforts.  Without cooperation
from Apple, I don't see how any vendor can develop accessibility products.

 Steve


 -----Original Message-----
From: * EASI: Equal Access to Software & Information
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jim Rebman
Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 3:25 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Alva ceases development of outspoken and enlarge for mackintosh

 Jim,

 Mostly agreed, and support for other assistive technologies on the Mac is
certainly well established, and nobody would argue with that, but if it
doesn't work for blind students, then it just can't be considered legal or
ethical for educational purposes.  Also remember that Apple made a
conscious decision to drop their accessibility group and has done very
little, if anything to support the screen reader manufacturers in the same
ways Microsoft has with things like MSAA (flawed as it is), internal policy
changes, developer support, accessible web pages and documentation, and so
on.  If it takes the same kind of threat that was necessary to get
Microsoft to "find religion", as it were, then I would think we would
support that, as well as hope it never came to an actual suit or
proceeding.  They dropped the ball and it's time for them to pick it up again.

 -- Jim



<<<<


------------------------
                EASI Juluy Courses http://easi.cc/workshop.htm
Beginner Barrier-free Web Design
Train the Trainer
...             .
                Norman Coombs
CEO EASI (Equal Access to Software and Information)
(949) 922-5992 (cell)


ATOM RSS1 RSS2