Bobby,

My only point about Senator Clinton was that she hasn't done anything most
other politicians have done.  That would include having an agenda--in the
case of many politicians, possibly a harmful one.  I'm sorry for any
confusion my statements may have caused--I considered them neutral.

Let me make it clear that I do not know nor claim to know enough about the
Senator's actions to support or refute them specifically--only to state that
they aren't in and of themselves any more "evil" than the actions of a great
many politicians.

Scott

----- Original Message -----
From: BG Greer, PhD <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 6:28 PM
Subject: Re: Ironies


> Scott,
>
>        You are correct about President Bush's administration and
> constitutional rights.
> I can not agree with you about Senator Clinton. She has an agenda and in
its
> own way it will restrict the rights of parents to discipline their
children
> and other "big government" tactics. I sound like a far right wing nut, but
> having lived in Memphis which is next to Arkansas, we heard more about
Mrs. C then
> most folks.
>
> Bobby
>
>
> > What George W. Bush has done to the office of President and to the
> > Constitution of this country (particularly to the doctrine of habeus
corpus)
> > is far more troubling to me.
> >
> >
>