I also appreciate the talk on Jaws and WindowEyes as I will be getting one
soon and at least on this list you can hear both sides. But does any have
subscription info for a Jaws e-mail list and a WindowEyes list?
Thanks
73
Scott
N0HOK / ZL1CHM
Auckland New Zealand
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Behler" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 6:55 AM
Subject: Re: JAWS vs. Window-Eyes
> Folks:
>
> I agree with Terri here.
>
> I know this isn't a computer users' list-serve, but it is a blindhams list
> serve, and since we all use computers for ham radio and other
applications,
> the topic seems relevant to me.
>
> Personally, I really appreciate the dialogue, and, as someone earlier
said,
> if something isn't of interest, just hit the good old delete button.
>
> I myself am going to be switching to Windows XP and Jaws 5.0 both at work
> and at home this summer, and really appreciate knowing that a bunch of
> down-to-earth people are available on this list to help with those
questions
> that crop up from time to time.
>
> So, in my oppinion, thanks, guys!
>
> Best 73 from Tom Behler: KB8TYJ
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Terri Pannett" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 11:46 PM
> Subject: Re: JAWS vs. Window-Eyes
>
>
> > I think the thread is interesting. Have you noticed there are more
> > questions about how to get JAWS to do this or that than WindowEyes? It
> > implies WE either does the job better or is easier to learn how to use.
> >
> > You can always relate screen readers to ham radio if you want to use
them
> > for reading Packet or Pactor or how about comparing screen readers when
> you
> > want to program a radio using your PC.
> >
> > Terri, Amateur radio call sign KF6CA. Army MARS call sign AAT9PX,
> > California
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Howard Kaufman" <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: <[log in to unmask]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 5:09 PM
> > Subject: Re: JAWS vs. Window-Eyes
> >
> >
> > > Not much I admit but their are really thoughtful and smart people up
> here.
> > > Besides, does every qso have to only discuss rig antenna and RST?
> > >
>
>
|