BLIND-HAMS Archives

For blind ham radio operators

BLIND-HAMS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Blind-Hams For blind ham radio operators <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 13 Sep 2003 23:42:54 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
I also have both and I'm sure glad I don't have to pick 1 over the other
because I like both the same, I find myself going for the TH-F6 more then
the Icom because I like to use the b band as a scanner, but that's the only
reason, other then that I can't pick 1 if I had to.
John Miller N1UMJ
Owner: J E M Racing need sponsors and crew help
to chat with me  AOL instant messenger JEMracing3
----- Original Message -----
From: "Butch Bussen" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2003 9:38 PM
Subject: Re: Accessible Dual-Band HT's


> I have both the icom t-90 and kenwood th-f6.  I wrote a comparison file a
> while back and can repost if interested.  I actually prefer the Kenwood as
> I think it is a little more accessable, although some on here like the
> t-90.  Depends on what you're looking for.  220 versis 6 meters,
> sensativity on tv channels and so forth.  my biggest gripe on the icom is
> that darn key pad.  Wish they'd have kept it standard.
> 73s
> Butch Bussen
> wa0vjr

ATOM RSS1 RSS2