>I wonder if they noticed the conflict in the idea of a mouse driven screen
>reader.
I think that while such a feature can certainly be useful to some people,
it should hardly be called a screen reader. If there is no speech access
to graphical controls, or truly interactive access to text, you simply
can't think of it as a screen reader -- maybe they should call it a text
reader or something like that.
-- Jim
------------
James A. Rebman
Cognitive Levers Project
Center for Life-Long Learning and Design
Department of Computer Science
University of Colorado, Boulder
"Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more
violent. It takes a touch of genius and a lot of courage to move in the
opposite direction."
- E. F. Schumacher