At 12:27 6/19/03, Philip Thrift wrote:
>On Thu, 19 Jun 2003 09:09:52 -0700, ginny wilken <[log in to unmask]>
>wrote:
>
>>And even if cooking started early on, could it not have been our "original
>>sin"? Nothing says we waited until agriculture to start making mistakes.
>>But we undoubtedly evolved originally on raw foods. Do we need to go back
>>further than Paleo times to see what is truly prototypical?
>
>For our species, I don't think so.
>Hence the PaleoDiet (cooked). Not the PrePaleoDiet (raw).

Philip; why don't you think so? Did we not evolve, or were we not designed
to function, on raw? Do you think we changed to make cooked more correct
for us? Were we just waiting around to evolve as a species until the advent
of cooking? I don't understand what you're saying. Where does prototypical
start?

ginny

All stunts performed without a net!