On Tue, 13 May 2003 19:39:24 -0400, Craig Smith <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
snip
>
> Then wouldn't it be "two inuit" rather than "two inuk"?
>
No. This is the kind of language oddity that is memorable to me.
My guess at the reason is that baby makes three, which creates a
people/tribe/nation.
--
Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/