deri ask what i thought of a swedish (i think) drug
company who used koreans to test a drug. once the drug
was approved, they cut the test and left the koreans
in the lurch.

cdc has guiedlines on treatment of human test
subjects. if i am ceo of that company, i'd go by that
and more. in the case as quoted by deri, i'd continue
to see that the test people had the drug. i can not
see how a few hundred test subjects would have busted
the budget of a huge corperation. the company was more
callous that i would be if i were the ceo. maybe
bureauacracy, standards before the testing should be
there to take care of these type situations.

hope that answers the question of what i thought about
that.

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com