Okay, perhaps I'm missing something really obvious here, but what's so bad about having a "non-human" molecule in our body?  Don't we have a great deal of those?

Yes, it's possible this particular molecule is bad, as it's possible a great many things are, but why the focus on its "non-human" status?

Joshua Sonnikson

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paleogal [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 4:30 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Red meat causes tissue inflamation??
>
> From: "william" <[log in to unmask]>
> > http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2003/09/030930055440.htm
> >
> >Cooking bad! See second paragraph. ;)
>
> I think high heat is bad and I remember the cautions in the 70's & 80's
> against barbecue and high heat but the jury is still out on this one.
> Seeing is believing and if I find out I can get tested for this non-human
> molecule, I'll be the first one in line.  Why were only three adults
> tested
> and what was the criteria for the chosen subjects?  We need more info.....
> Oliva(who hates to be thrown a curve ball)