PALEOFOOD Archives

Paleolithic Eating Support List

PALEOFOOD@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Paleolithic Eating Support List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 3 Jul 2003 11:07:05 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (46 lines)
maybe this site will help clear up some of the confusion - 'The Food Time Line'
it has recipes too....http://www.gti.net/mocolib1/kid/food.html
it has a neat link to 'Agriculture begins...' 

Dedy
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Kylix _ 
  To: [log in to unmask] 
  Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 10:09 AM
  Subject: Re: Milk


  I'm a little confused here.
  I've always thought that milk in general is not paleo,
  except for those few who have started to adapt to it
  (most frequently cited being the Swedish).
  And now Eva, from Sweden, is actually against it.

  For Asians, is milk really non-paleo, pasteurized or not? Are
  all dairy products absolutely out of the question?

  thanks.




  7/3/2003 4:31:05 PM, Andrew <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

  >< Tell me what kind of negative effects does raw milk from a healthy animal
  >> have on a person who's not intolerant to lactose and casein?>
  >
  >I agree with Frank here.  The Caucasian race has made a collective decision
  >that dairy is good, since more than 80% of Caucasian adults retain the
  >ability to digest lactose.
  >
  >Once milk is pasteurised, some of the whey proteins can be modified, since
  >they are very heat-sensitive. it is likely these are the allergens if
  >someone reacts badly.
  >
  >While it's not paleo, your ancestors of 1,000 years ago would regard you as
  >exceedingly stupid for neglecting a valuable food resource.
  >
  >Andrew
  >
  >

ATOM RSS1 RSS2