The Other Face
By PAUL KRUGMAN


ight now we're debating whether the Republican Senate majority leader is a
racist who yearns for the days of segregation or just a good ole boy who
says a lot of things that make it seem like he's a racist who yearns for the
days of segregation." So writes Joshua Marshall, whose talkingpointsmemo.com
is must reading for the politically curious, and who, more than anyone else,
is responsible for making Trent Lott's offensive remarks the issue they
deserve to be.

But this discussion shouldn't really be about Mr. Lott. It should be about
how a man who sounds like Mr. Lott came to be leader of the Senate.

Let's be clear that last week's remarks were in no way out of character. On
the contrary, they were entirely consistent with Mr. Lott's statements on
many other occasions.

The great majority of Americans don't share Mr. Lott's views. For example,
he opposed declaring Martin Luther King day a holiday, telling Southern
Partisan magazine that "we have not done it for a lot of other people that
were more deserving." Most Americans, I think, believe that King was pretty
deserving.

So why is Mr. Lott in a position of such power?

The Republican Party's longstanding "Southern strategy" — which rests on
appealing to the minority of voters who do share Mr. Lott's views — is no
secret. But because the majority doesn't share those views, the party must
present two faces to the nation. And therein lies the clue to Mr. Lott's
role.

To win nationally, the leader of the party must pay tribute to the tolerance
and open-mindedness of the nation at large. He must celebrate civil rights
and sternly condemn the abuses of the past. And that's just what George W.
Bush did yesterday, in rebuking Mr. Lott.

Yet at the same time the party must convey to a select group of target
voters the message — nudge nudge, wink wink — that it actually doesn't mean
any of that nonsense, that it's really on their side. How can it do that? By
having men who manifestly don't share the open-mindedness of the nation at
large in key, powerful positions. And that's why Mr. Bush's rebuke was not
followed by a call for Mr. Lott to step down.

Of course, Mr. Lott isn't alone in that role. The Bush administration's
judicial nominations have clearly been chosen to give a signal of support to
those target Southern voters. A striking example has just emerged: We've
learned that Mr. Lott supported the right of Bob Jones University to keep
its tax-exempt status even while banning interracial dating; supporting his
position was none other than Michael McConnell, a controversial figure
recently confirmed as an appeals judge.

Notice, by the way, who really gets served in this charade. The open-minded
majority gets ringing affirmations of its principles; but once the dust has
settled, the people who agree with Mr. Lott get to keep him as majority
leader, and get the judgeships too.

Still, pulling off a two-faced political strategy is tricky. What prevents
reporters from explaining to the majority the coded messages that are being
sent to the minority?

Good question; I wish I knew the answer. But what's remarkable in the Lott
affair is how much he has gotten away with over the years. How many readers
ever heard about the flap, several years ago, over Mr. Lott's association
with the racist Council of Conservative Citizens? The scandal was actually
worse than his remarks last week — but it just got buried. And without the
indefatigable efforts of Mr. Marshall and a few other Internet writers, Mr.
Lott's recent celebration of segregation would probably have been buried as
well.

My guess is that the White House believes it has now done enough. Mr. Lott
has received his slap on the wrist; now we can go back to business as usual.

Bear in mind that while Mr. Bush has finally denounced Mr. Lott's remarks,
he and his party benefit from the strategy that allows the likes of Mr. Lott
to hold so much power. Let's not forget, in particular, the blatant attempts
to discourage minority voting in South Dakota, Louisiana, Maryland and
elsewhere. It's about time for those of us in the press to pay attention,
and let this great, tolerant nation know what's really going on.









_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

To unsubscribe/subscribe or view archives of postings, go to the Gambia-L Web interface
at: http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/gambia-l.html
To contact the List Management, please send an e-mail to:
[log in to unmask]

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~