BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS Archives

The listserv where the buildings do the talking

BULLAMANKA-PINHEADS@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Robert J. Cagnetta" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
"Let us not speak foul in folly!" - ][<en Phollit
Date:
Mon, 24 Feb 2003 09:56:43 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
From what I have been able to pick up in the barrage, then trickles of
information, the shuttle was breaking up not long after re-entry.  They
suspect that there was some damage to the wheel well covers and the front
part of the left wing. Even though the designs of the shuttle were
relatively the same, for some reason the Challenger had a different tile
configuration, a bit "rougher" and a more tedious layout than the others,
making it more vulnerable upon damage.  So they think, at least
unofficially, that the foam fragments that fell off the booster rocket
during take off may have done some damage to the tiles and the wheel well
covers.  And since the temp gets up to about 3000 degrees, and the
underlying aluminum melts at what 800 degrees, they didn't have a chance
even over California.  So when those gauges freaked out over Texas, the heat
was in and the shuttle was breaking up.  Apparently there analysis of the
damage after take off was a bit too optimistic.  Another theory is all of
that space junk out there hit them on the way in.  Unfortunately, flying at
Mach 12 has its inherent dangers.


Rob Cagnetta

--
To terminate puerile preservation prattling among pals and the
uncoffee-ed, or to change your settings, go to:
<http://maelstrom.stjohns.edu/archives/bullamanka-pinheads.html>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2