C-PALSY Archives

Cerebral Palsy List

C-PALSY@LISTSERV.ICORS.ORG

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
"St. John's University Cerebral Palsy List" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Kathy Salkin <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 23 Oct 2002 12:21:55 -0400
Reply-To:
"St. John's University Cerebral Palsy List" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
I'm a gun control advocate generally speaking, not because outlawing guns
would make it harder for criminals to get guns - it doesn't - but because
stupid people legally get guns and stupidly kill others through avoidable
accidents.  I don't think we have enough gun safety requirements in place.

That's not an issue here, though, because you're right, whether you have a gun
to defend yourself or not would not be a factor in whether you could defend
yourself against the sniper.  You can't.  It's that simple and that's what's
so scary.

Kat

> As much as I admire and respect your opinions,
> Kat, I really can't fathom
> how additional firearms legislation is going to
> help--now or in the future.
> Does this man, or any criminal for that matter,
> give a damn about THE LAW?
> Especially when the laws already on the books
> are unenforced, under-enforced
> or plea-bargained into impotence.  I know it's
> an old wheeze, but there's
> truth in the saying that "when you outlaw guns,
> only outlaws will have
> guns"--at least in our American culture.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2